The Future of Journalism: California’s Pay-to-Publish Compromise

The relationship between tech giants and news outlets has long been a contentious one. With the rise of social media and online advertising, news organizations have struggled to stay afloat, while tech companies have reaped the benefits of their content. However, a new bill in California may be about to change the game.

Assembly Bill 886, also known as the California Journalism Preservation Act, would require digital platforms to pay news outlets a fee when they sell advertising alongside news content. The bill has been making its way through the state legislature, with the latest development being its passage through the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The California State Capitol building in Sacramento

The bill’s supporters argue that it is necessary to support the struggling news industry, which is essential to a healthy democracy. As Sen. Tom Umberg (D-Orange) put it, “The demise of journalism harms democracy… Thus, we have an obligation to find a way to support reasonable, credible journalism.”

The proposed legislation would create a fund that tech firms would pay into, with the money being distributed to news outlets based on the number of journalists they employ. Publishers would have to use 70% of the money they receive to pay journalists in California.

A journalist at work

Google, one of the tech giants that would be affected by the bill, has expressed opposition to the proposal. Jaffer Zaidi, Google’s vice president of global news partnerships, testified that the bill would “break the fundamental and foundational principles of the open Internet, forcing platforms to pay publishers for sending valuable free traffic to them.”

However, the bill’s author, Assemblymember Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland), remains committed to finding a solution that works for all parties involved. She has been engaging with companies that oppose the bill, hoping to reach a compromise that will allow the news industry to thrive.

A bustling newsroom

The bill’s passage is not a done deal yet, but its progress is a promising sign for the future of journalism. As Sen. Henry Stern (D-Calabasas) put it, talks are “closer and closer to the place where we could actually land some kind of deal.”

The California State Flag

The California Journalism Preservation Act is not the first of its kind. In Canada, Google is already paying $74 million annually into a fund for the news industry under a similar law. It remains to be seen whether California will follow suit, but one thing is clear: the future of journalism is at stake, and it’s time for tech companies and news outlets to work together to find a solution.

A news headline